Well, this explains alot:
Israel aims its nuclear warheads at Europe
The seventh Israeli radio broadcast an interview with Professor Martin Van-Crevel, a noted world specialist in low-intensity wars. Former Professor of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Van-Crevel discussed publicly what he has been advocating for years in closed military academic circles in Israel and the United States.
In his view, the continued struggle of the Palestinians will inexhorably lead to the collapse of the State of Israel. Which is why Tel-Aviv has no choice but to "transfer" the Israeli Arabs and the stateless Palestinians beyond safe borders (that is, not only outside the 1948 borders but also from the 1976 occupied territories and, ideally, from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip). In the event the Europeans opposed such a transfer, in order to survive Tel Aviv will be forced to destroy the European capitals with nuclear weapons, it being understood that the Europeans will be unable to retaliate without annihilating their Palestinian friends.
“The Palestinians should all be deported. The people who strive for this (the Israeli government) are waiting only for the right man and the right time. Two years ago, only 7 or 8 per cent of Israelis were of the opinion that this would be the best solution, two months ago it was 33 per cent, and now, according to a Gallup poll, the figure is 44 percent.”
The author of The Transformation of War forcefully stated that, as of now, there are already nuclear warheads aimed against Rome and other European capitals that render the threat credible and the "transfer" of the Palestinians possible.
Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
What is up with this pic? (Not to mention the story itself...)
Do the heads in the background not match those in the foreground? I may be wrong but there is something about this photo that screams photoshop to me.
This is on the CBC's world section website, along with this article:
Fake Terror Plot Threatened Obama Inauguration
Is Michelle's tongue sticking out??
Why now?
WTF??
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Camouflage for Canadian Cities
Soldiers could get uniforms for urban jungle
Future Canadian soldiers could be wearing new uniforms designed to provide camouflage on the streets of our largest cities.
The Defence Department will know by March what designs might work for what is being called a Canadian Urban Environment Pattern.
Those designs are to be based on the "unique requirements" of the urban settings of Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto, according to an outline of the project being co-ordinated by scientists at Defence Research and Development Canada in Suffield, Alta.
Ottawa, the nerve centre of government and the military, was left off the list because it doesn't rate as a major metropolitan centre.
I don't know whether to laugh out loud, or cry!
Troops in the streets?
In Canada?
Tell me it's not so??
Why would they need this specifically for Canadian cities? The olympics? The 'Pandemic'? Civil unrest?
Makes my head shake.
Future Canadian soldiers could be wearing new uniforms designed to provide camouflage on the streets of our largest cities.
The Defence Department will know by March what designs might work for what is being called a Canadian Urban Environment Pattern.
Those designs are to be based on the "unique requirements" of the urban settings of Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto, according to an outline of the project being co-ordinated by scientists at Defence Research and Development Canada in Suffield, Alta.
Ottawa, the nerve centre of government and the military, was left off the list because it doesn't rate as a major metropolitan centre.
I don't know whether to laugh out loud, or cry!
Troops in the streets?
In Canada?
Tell me it's not so??
Why would they need this specifically for Canadian cities? The olympics? The 'Pandemic'? Civil unrest?
Makes my head shake.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Friday, July 24, 2009
Hedy Epstein Interview: When Remembering isn't Enough
In light of a few other events, I thought I'd post this up. Hedy is a brave and honourable woman - a rare bird and hero. The fanatic who assaulted this woman for her beliefs and her will to stand up to evil does more harm to his precious zionist Israel than Hedy could ever do.
I think they are getting desperate, which is of course a double edged sword. While is exposes the ugliest side of the extremists on both sides of the issue of the Occupation, a desperate animal, one backed into a corner can be a very dangerous one. Things are certainly heating up, nearing the boiling point. The current situation cannot maintain itself for much longer - all Hell will break loose and it won't be won by a simple PR barrage.
Kudos to the Free Gaza Movement, and best of luck to Hedy on her return in August!
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Neo-Nazis, the CJC and Agent Provacatuers
I know that quite a few of us already are aware of this, but hey, I gotta say: Way to go Ezra!!
Canadian Jewish Congress Organised Nazis
A Jewish-Canadian author is in a battle of words with the Canadian Jewish Congress after alleging the organization props up neo-nazi groups to get “hate crime” legislation passed and expand the role of the country’s Human Rights Commission.
Neo-conservative author Ezra Levant claims in his latest book, Shakedown, that the Canadian Jewish Congress hired ex-cop John Garrity to work for the Canadian Nazi Party in the 1960’s. In 1965 and 1966, Garrity was put in charge of membership for the group and organized the dozen or so “rag-tag band of losers” into an outfit that garned a lot of press coverage.
That media attention was used by the CJC to build up a precieved public threat that persuaded Parliament to abridge Canada’s freedom of speech, Levant contends. The CJC, which had been advocating restrictions on free speech in Canada since the 1930’s, used the Nazi Party’s publicity to successfully lobby for the 1971 “hate law” (Section 319 of the Criminal Code). The end result was the enactment of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which “empowers the Canadian Human Rights Commission to deal with complaints regarding the communication of hate messages by telephone or on the Internet.”
Click the link above for the rest of this very revealing article.
It certainly makes one wonder as to who and what are behind these so-called domestic terror groups as well.
It is my opinion that the CJC and B'nai B'rith should declare themselves as agents of a foreign government.
Seems these organisations have a long history of making the trouble they imagine themselves. Problem, reaction, solution.
Edited to add the link to Ezra's own article:
Why Did the Jewish Congress Build Up the Nazi Party?
The above, please read it all - it's Ezra at his finest - contains his response to Bulka's own rant in the Ottawa Citizen:
In 1965 and 1966, the Canadian Jewish Congress helped organize the fledgling Canadian Nazi Party. That sounds crazy, but it's true, and I wrote about it in Shakedown, my new book about Canada's human rights commissions.
In a letter to the editor in the Citizen last week, the CJC's current co-president, Rabbi Reuven Bulka, called my book's description of the CJC's role "fiction." He said all the CJC did for the Nazis was buy them a bottle of rum.
It's true that the CJC did buy drinks for Nazis in the 1960s. That's pretty strange in itself, and I'd like to hear more of Rabbi Bulka's thoughts on spending Jewish charitable donations that way. But the CJC did a lot more than that: they hired an ex-cop named John Garrity to go to work for the Canadian Nazi Party.
Garrity helped organize that rag-tag band of losers, though they never amounted to anything except for fodder for the press.
There were only a dozen active Nazis when Garrity joined them and they weren't really a political party. He called them "harmless misfits," and they were -- their leader, John Beattie, was a nervous, gaunt, unemployed 24-year-old clerk who spent much of his time dodging angry Jews who tried to beat him up. (One of Garrity's jobs was to help Beattie escape street fights.)
Garrity brought more than just rum to the Nazis. He brought with him pretty much the only organizational talent the group had. They put him in charge of membership. Garrity called himself the "Heinrich Himmler" of the party, and a "Nazi leader for the Jewish Congress."
I'd like Rabbi Bulka's thoughts on that, too.
Of course, Garrity helped his paymasters at the CJC, too, giving them information about the names of party members and donors. And when Garrity finally quit the Nazis, he wrote a tell-all about his adventure in Maclean's magazine.
Garrity larded that report with personal insults toward Beattie and the Nazis. But he did acknowledge that they had never done, or even contemplated doing, anything illegal. All of the violence he witnessed was directed at Beattie, usually by Jewish vigilantes. "Sadly, it is the ... anti-Nazi extremists who, in their attempts to destroy Beattie, provide him with most of the publicity he craves. If it weren't for the riots and the assaults and the public protest meetings they hold, there'd be no real news in Beattie," Garrity wrote.
And that is the importance of this story and why I put it in my book about human rights commissions. Beattie hadn't done anything illegal. He was just a loser who believed in a discredited ideology. But the CJC wanted to bring in political censorship laws and I believe they needed to build up the threat to persuade Parliament to abridge Canada's freedom of speech.
Garrity puffed up a group of Nazi nobodies into a national menace, first through organizational support and then through spectacular media publicity. And, sure enough, Parliament enacted section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which censors offensive speech.
That's become a pattern. Twenty years after the Canadian Nazi Party vanished, CSIS, Canada's spy agency, inserted an operative named Grant Bristow into another rag-tag racist group called the Heritage Front.
Unlike Garrity, Bristow didn't play second-fiddle.
He became the boss, turning the Heritage Front into Canada's leading white supremacist group. This time it wasn't just Jewish money that was spent propping up neo-Nazis -- all taxpayers paid for it.
Which brings us to the present day -- and back to Rabbi Bulka and the section 13 censorship law. Canada's largest customer of section 13 is Richard Warman, who has been the complainant in all but two cases heard by the tribunal this decade. The CJC was so impressed that they gave Warman an award.
But, in a stunning human rights tribunal ruling last month, Warman himself was rebuked for posting anti-Semitic comments on Stormfront, a neo-Nazi website, including a message calling Jews "scum." Warman has stated that he was attempting to gather information on real Nazis, but the tribunal called his actions "disappointing and disturbing," and ruled that he risked encouraging more hateful messages himself.
Warman's actions appalled the tribunal, but apparently not the CJC. Just as the CJC did with Garrity, Nazi opponents continue to stir up neo-Nazi incidents -- as if there aren't enough real threats to Jews as it is.
Perhaps Rabbi Bulka can explain that one, too.
Another edit:
I was reading the comments at Ezra's blog, where a poster linked to this:
Dissapporbation: Censorship's Most Powerful Tool and a good little argument put forth by Doug Christie of the perils of 'peer pressure' and the fear of disapproval. Worth a listen.
I think part of true freedom is the freedom within oneself not to concern themselves with what others may think of them, trueness and loyalty to one's own ideals is in its own way a form of spiritual and individual freedom.
Canadian Jewish Congress Organised Nazis
A Jewish-Canadian author is in a battle of words with the Canadian Jewish Congress after alleging the organization props up neo-nazi groups to get “hate crime” legislation passed and expand the role of the country’s Human Rights Commission.
Neo-conservative author Ezra Levant claims in his latest book, Shakedown, that the Canadian Jewish Congress hired ex-cop John Garrity to work for the Canadian Nazi Party in the 1960’s. In 1965 and 1966, Garrity was put in charge of membership for the group and organized the dozen or so “rag-tag band of losers” into an outfit that garned a lot of press coverage.
That media attention was used by the CJC to build up a precieved public threat that persuaded Parliament to abridge Canada’s freedom of speech, Levant contends. The CJC, which had been advocating restrictions on free speech in Canada since the 1930’s, used the Nazi Party’s publicity to successfully lobby for the 1971 “hate law” (Section 319 of the Criminal Code). The end result was the enactment of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which “empowers the Canadian Human Rights Commission to deal with complaints regarding the communication of hate messages by telephone or on the Internet.”
Click the link above for the rest of this very revealing article.
It certainly makes one wonder as to who and what are behind these so-called domestic terror groups as well.
It is my opinion that the CJC and B'nai B'rith should declare themselves as agents of a foreign government.
Seems these organisations have a long history of making the trouble they imagine themselves. Problem, reaction, solution.
Edited to add the link to Ezra's own article:
Why Did the Jewish Congress Build Up the Nazi Party?
The above, please read it all - it's Ezra at his finest - contains his response to Bulka's own rant in the Ottawa Citizen:
In 1965 and 1966, the Canadian Jewish Congress helped organize the fledgling Canadian Nazi Party. That sounds crazy, but it's true, and I wrote about it in Shakedown, my new book about Canada's human rights commissions.
In a letter to the editor in the Citizen last week, the CJC's current co-president, Rabbi Reuven Bulka, called my book's description of the CJC's role "fiction." He said all the CJC did for the Nazis was buy them a bottle of rum.
It's true that the CJC did buy drinks for Nazis in the 1960s. That's pretty strange in itself, and I'd like to hear more of Rabbi Bulka's thoughts on spending Jewish charitable donations that way. But the CJC did a lot more than that: they hired an ex-cop named John Garrity to go to work for the Canadian Nazi Party.
Garrity helped organize that rag-tag band of losers, though they never amounted to anything except for fodder for the press.
There were only a dozen active Nazis when Garrity joined them and they weren't really a political party. He called them "harmless misfits," and they were -- their leader, John Beattie, was a nervous, gaunt, unemployed 24-year-old clerk who spent much of his time dodging angry Jews who tried to beat him up. (One of Garrity's jobs was to help Beattie escape street fights.)
Garrity brought more than just rum to the Nazis. He brought with him pretty much the only organizational talent the group had. They put him in charge of membership. Garrity called himself the "Heinrich Himmler" of the party, and a "Nazi leader for the Jewish Congress."
I'd like Rabbi Bulka's thoughts on that, too.
Of course, Garrity helped his paymasters at the CJC, too, giving them information about the names of party members and donors. And when Garrity finally quit the Nazis, he wrote a tell-all about his adventure in Maclean's magazine.
Garrity larded that report with personal insults toward Beattie and the Nazis. But he did acknowledge that they had never done, or even contemplated doing, anything illegal. All of the violence he witnessed was directed at Beattie, usually by Jewish vigilantes. "Sadly, it is the ... anti-Nazi extremists who, in their attempts to destroy Beattie, provide him with most of the publicity he craves. If it weren't for the riots and the assaults and the public protest meetings they hold, there'd be no real news in Beattie," Garrity wrote.
And that is the importance of this story and why I put it in my book about human rights commissions. Beattie hadn't done anything illegal. He was just a loser who believed in a discredited ideology. But the CJC wanted to bring in political censorship laws and I believe they needed to build up the threat to persuade Parliament to abridge Canada's freedom of speech.
Garrity puffed up a group of Nazi nobodies into a national menace, first through organizational support and then through spectacular media publicity. And, sure enough, Parliament enacted section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which censors offensive speech.
That's become a pattern. Twenty years after the Canadian Nazi Party vanished, CSIS, Canada's spy agency, inserted an operative named Grant Bristow into another rag-tag racist group called the Heritage Front.
Unlike Garrity, Bristow didn't play second-fiddle.
He became the boss, turning the Heritage Front into Canada's leading white supremacist group. This time it wasn't just Jewish money that was spent propping up neo-Nazis -- all taxpayers paid for it.
Which brings us to the present day -- and back to Rabbi Bulka and the section 13 censorship law. Canada's largest customer of section 13 is Richard Warman, who has been the complainant in all but two cases heard by the tribunal this decade. The CJC was so impressed that they gave Warman an award.
But, in a stunning human rights tribunal ruling last month, Warman himself was rebuked for posting anti-Semitic comments on Stormfront, a neo-Nazi website, including a message calling Jews "scum." Warman has stated that he was attempting to gather information on real Nazis, but the tribunal called his actions "disappointing and disturbing," and ruled that he risked encouraging more hateful messages himself.
Warman's actions appalled the tribunal, but apparently not the CJC. Just as the CJC did with Garrity, Nazi opponents continue to stir up neo-Nazi incidents -- as if there aren't enough real threats to Jews as it is.
Perhaps Rabbi Bulka can explain that one, too.
Another edit:
I was reading the comments at Ezra's blog, where a poster linked to this:
Dissapporbation: Censorship's Most Powerful Tool and a good little argument put forth by Doug Christie of the perils of 'peer pressure' and the fear of disapproval. Worth a listen.
I think part of true freedom is the freedom within oneself not to concern themselves with what others may think of them, trueness and loyalty to one's own ideals is in its own way a form of spiritual and individual freedom.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
It Just Gets Worse: Terror Round-up in Britian Complete Waste of Time
Well, it seems that these guys had nothing, hence NO evidence was found by the police to even come near to laying a charge.
I wonder whether or not this was another set up with a government mule to attempt to goad others into 'terrorist' activity - like our own Mubin Shiek. We know the Brits did this with the IRA, we know the FBI did it during the 93 World Trade Center bombings (and of course there is 911 too).
Wasn't it all rather convenient that a photographer was right there, to take that snapshot, which started the whole ball rolling! All at the time needed to divert public attention away from the abuse of power demonstrated by the 'security forces' during the G20, leading to the death of Ian Tomlinson amongst other at the very least non-lethal assaults.
Convenient indeed:
Read on in the Independent:
Police and PM in dock over arrest of terrorist suspects
The case against 12 Muslim men involved in what Gordon Brown described as a "major terrorist plot" amounted to one email and a handful of ambiguous telephone conversations, it emerged last night after all the men were released without charge.
Eleven Pakistani students and one British man were freed after extensive searches of 14 addresses in North-west England failed to locate evidence of terrorist activity, according to security sources. Police did not find any explosives, firearms, target lists, documents or any material which could have been used to carry out an attack.
I wonder whether or not this was another set up with a government mule to attempt to goad others into 'terrorist' activity - like our own Mubin Shiek. We know the Brits did this with the IRA, we know the FBI did it during the 93 World Trade Center bombings (and of course there is 911 too).
Wasn't it all rather convenient that a photographer was right there, to take that snapshot, which started the whole ball rolling! All at the time needed to divert public attention away from the abuse of power demonstrated by the 'security forces' during the G20, leading to the death of Ian Tomlinson amongst other at the very least non-lethal assaults.
Convenient indeed:
Read on in the Independent:
Police and PM in dock over arrest of terrorist suspects
The case against 12 Muslim men involved in what Gordon Brown described as a "major terrorist plot" amounted to one email and a handful of ambiguous telephone conversations, it emerged last night after all the men were released without charge.
Eleven Pakistani students and one British man were freed after extensive searches of 14 addresses in North-west England failed to locate evidence of terrorist activity, according to security sources. Police did not find any explosives, firearms, target lists, documents or any material which could have been used to carry out an attack.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Another failed attempt at Booga Booga
Well, it seems that those nasty terrorists arrested shortly after the death of Ian Tomlinson at the hands of the G20 security personel will all be set free - due to lack of evidence!!
Can anyone truly think that this whole maneuver was no more than an attempt at deflection from the behaviour of the police?
Britain won't charge 12 arrested in Anti-Terror Sweep
Twelve men arrested in a series of anti-terrorist raids involving hundreds of officers across northwest England earlier this month will not face charges due to insufficient evidence, British prosecutors said Wednesday.
***
While British officials haven't provided any details about what the men were suspected of doing, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has previously said authorities were on to "a very big terrorist plot."
Seems to me that this 'raid' was clearly executed for the sole reason of diverting attention from the misconduct of security officers during the G20. Like many of the round-ups before this, no charges will be laid, so in other words it was a grand farce designed to whip up more booga booga and keep the populace in fear of the ever present Muslim Terrorist.
What a joke.
Can anyone truly think that this whole maneuver was no more than an attempt at deflection from the behaviour of the police?
Britain won't charge 12 arrested in Anti-Terror Sweep
Twelve men arrested in a series of anti-terrorist raids involving hundreds of officers across northwest England earlier this month will not face charges due to insufficient evidence, British prosecutors said Wednesday.
***
While British officials haven't provided any details about what the men were suspected of doing, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has previously said authorities were on to "a very big terrorist plot."
Seems to me that this 'raid' was clearly executed for the sole reason of diverting attention from the misconduct of security officers during the G20. Like many of the round-ups before this, no charges will be laid, so in other words it was a grand farce designed to whip up more booga booga and keep the populace in fear of the ever present Muslim Terrorist.
What a joke.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Welcome to Canada Israel North, No Not You Mr. Galloway!!
Well, it's totally confirmed now - as if there was any doubt.
Israel controls Canada's policies. Period. End of Line.
What a fracking joke.
I am outraged and ashamed of our pitiful politicians and in this case the spineless judge, Luc Martineau. No doubt he received a phone call or visit from our dishonourable friends at the JDL!!
What did they give you Judge? What did they threaten you with? Hmmmm? Here are some of his weasely words:
The judge noted there is some evidence that may back Galloway's claim the matter had been "prejudged" and the result of "external lobbying" and "political influence," but he declined to overturn the decision "which is alleged to be one made in bad faith and politically motivated."
Evidence that 'may' back Galloway's claim?? May?? Good grief, the JDL was slapping itself on its back for achieving this!! They are a bloody terrorist organisation according to the CIA and FBI! Both B'nai B'rith and the CJC applauded it!! Holy crap can this judge be any more idiotic? Not able to use common sense??
The judge said if Galloway chooses to further challenge the federal government's decision, a court will likely have to grapple with the question of whether his participation in the aid convoy or any personal financial support for the convoy should be considered "engaging in terrorism" or whether it "simply represents a symbolic gesture and political statement made by pacifists through the provision of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people of Gaza."
Well - what does he think? Honestly, if Mr. Galloway were 'engaging in terrorism', how then could he still hold a seat in our sister parliament in England for crying out loud??
I hope he takes this the whole way through the courts! I am truly dumbfounded by this, and I sure hope other Canadians are too!! We admit Bush, Israeli War Criminals and the like, Suharto for instance - but not Galloway?
Here's some links to various reports:
Judge denies British MP Galloway's request to enter Canada - CBC
Judge denies Galloway's bid to enter Canada - Toronto Star
Galloway has no criminal record and has never been denied entry to any other country. Last week, he delivered a speech at New York's Columbia University in which he called for a single-state option in the Middle East.
British Lawmaker barred from Canada - JTA
I'll throw in this one, even though Penny already has it up, but it gushes like the above, and speaks to the judge's comment on 'political motivation':
Jewish group proud of role in barring Galloway
And just in case you missed it, the Jewish Defense League of Canada. Pay them a visit - it's worth it. These people are Kahanists - Mier Kahane was even considered a terrorist by Israel herself!!
How embarassing to be Canadian today.
Our new flag?
Israel controls Canada's policies. Period. End of Line.
What a fracking joke.
I am outraged and ashamed of our pitiful politicians and in this case the spineless judge, Luc Martineau. No doubt he received a phone call or visit from our dishonourable friends at the JDL!!
What did they give you Judge? What did they threaten you with? Hmmmm? Here are some of his weasely words:
The judge noted there is some evidence that may back Galloway's claim the matter had been "prejudged" and the result of "external lobbying" and "political influence," but he declined to overturn the decision "which is alleged to be one made in bad faith and politically motivated."
Evidence that 'may' back Galloway's claim?? May?? Good grief, the JDL was slapping itself on its back for achieving this!! They are a bloody terrorist organisation according to the CIA and FBI! Both B'nai B'rith and the CJC applauded it!! Holy crap can this judge be any more idiotic? Not able to use common sense??
The judge said if Galloway chooses to further challenge the federal government's decision, a court will likely have to grapple with the question of whether his participation in the aid convoy or any personal financial support for the convoy should be considered "engaging in terrorism" or whether it "simply represents a symbolic gesture and political statement made by pacifists through the provision of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people of Gaza."
Well - what does he think? Honestly, if Mr. Galloway were 'engaging in terrorism', how then could he still hold a seat in our sister parliament in England for crying out loud??
I hope he takes this the whole way through the courts! I am truly dumbfounded by this, and I sure hope other Canadians are too!! We admit Bush, Israeli War Criminals and the like, Suharto for instance - but not Galloway?
Here's some links to various reports:
Judge denies British MP Galloway's request to enter Canada - CBC
Judge denies Galloway's bid to enter Canada - Toronto Star
Galloway has no criminal record and has never been denied entry to any other country. Last week, he delivered a speech at New York's Columbia University in which he called for a single-state option in the Middle East.
British Lawmaker barred from Canada - JTA
I'll throw in this one, even though Penny already has it up, but it gushes like the above, and speaks to the judge's comment on 'political motivation':
Jewish group proud of role in barring Galloway
And just in case you missed it, the Jewish Defense League of Canada. Pay them a visit - it's worth it. These people are Kahanists - Mier Kahane was even considered a terrorist by Israel herself!!
How embarassing to be Canadian today.
Our new flag?
Decision Today on Galloway
Just a quickie:
Judge to rule whether British MP can enter Canada
Here's hoping for some sanity to prevail.
But I'm not holding my breath.
It sure feels wonderful being the JDL's lackey!!
Judge to rule whether British MP can enter Canada
Here's hoping for some sanity to prevail.
But I'm not holding my breath.
It sure feels wonderful being the JDL's lackey!!
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Care About Free Speech?
DEFEND FREE SPEECH
Website from Rivero's broadcast today.
Canada should be ashamed! Kenney must be polishing his jackboots!
What will it take for people to wake the F*** up????
Website from Rivero's broadcast today.
Canada should be ashamed! Kenney must be polishing his jackboots!
What will it take for people to wake the F*** up????
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Toronto 18, Er... 11?? Penny - this is for YOU!
Guilty verdict stands in Toronto bomb-plot trial, judge rules
A youth found guilty of terrorism-related offences was not entrapped by a paid RCMP mole, and the verdict will stand, a judge in Brampton, Ont., ruled Tuesday.
The decision in the case of the first person to stand trial among the so-called Toronto 18 means a finding of guilt now becomes a conviction.
"My conclusion is that there has not been entrapment," Ontario Superior Court Justice John Sproat said in his 51-page decision. "There has not been an abuse of process."
The youth, who was 17 at the time of his offences and cannot be named, was found guilty in September of helping, and taking part in, a terror-related organization.
Sproat said at the time that evidence the terrorist group existed was "overwhelming."
I put this up for Penny, who is wrapped up in American Pie right now, but hopefully she can do something with it on her blog, a she has already compiled alot of info about this fake terror cell.
This is such a joke, it would be laughable if peoples lives were not concerned.
Crazy - carpets you say?
ugh.
A youth found guilty of terrorism-related offences was not entrapped by a paid RCMP mole, and the verdict will stand, a judge in Brampton, Ont., ruled Tuesday.
The decision in the case of the first person to stand trial among the so-called Toronto 18 means a finding of guilt now becomes a conviction.
"My conclusion is that there has not been entrapment," Ontario Superior Court Justice John Sproat said in his 51-page decision. "There has not been an abuse of process."
The youth, who was 17 at the time of his offences and cannot be named, was found guilty in September of helping, and taking part in, a terror-related organization.
Sproat said at the time that evidence the terrorist group existed was "overwhelming."
I put this up for Penny, who is wrapped up in American Pie right now, but hopefully she can do something with it on her blog, a she has already compiled alot of info about this fake terror cell.
This is such a joke, it would be laughable if peoples lives were not concerned.
Crazy - carpets you say?
ugh.
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Canadian Armed Forces: NARCO COPS
Yes that's right - our once proud Armed Forces is now in the business of being Narcs. Below is a comment I left on CBC forums in regards to the plan by our so-called representatives in Parliament to begin targetting those farmers selling opium to 'Terrorists' (what not the CIA???).
**
The only way to eradicate the black market, crime and corruption which comes with trade in an illegal substance is to legalise it - period.
Impact of Crop Eradication in Afghanistan and lessons learned from Latin American to South East Asia
See part 3:
3 The impact of opium poppy eradication in Afghanistan
3.1 Social tension
3.2 The self-fulfilling prophecy of eradication: Higher prices and
higher profits for traffickers
3.3 Shifting opium cultivation
3.4 Eradication as an impediment to Afghanistan’s reconstruction
***
It has been demonstrated time and again that prohibition of a substance does not work.
Addiction, whether to legal or illegal substances or vices is a HEALTH issue and should be dealt with accordingly.
The only thing which prohibition encourages is corruption, inflated profits and turf 'wars'. It did not work for alcohol (besides making a few people VERY wealthy) and will not work for any substance.
Let the Afghan people use all of the resources which are available to them in their land - allow for legal production of opium and allow for production of associated medicines in situ.
Unless the goal is further radicalisation of the population, the current approach to the problems of drug abuse (not use) are inconsistent with logical thinking. One of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Prohibition has never worked and often makes the problems worse.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Listen to these brave men and women speak out about the draconian War on Drugs - they should know as they were in it.
**
The only way to eradicate the black market, crime and corruption which comes with trade in an illegal substance is to legalise it - period.
Impact of Crop Eradication in Afghanistan and lessons learned from Latin American to South East Asia
See part 3:
3 The impact of opium poppy eradication in Afghanistan
3.1 Social tension
3.2 The self-fulfilling prophecy of eradication: Higher prices and
higher profits for traffickers
3.3 Shifting opium cultivation
3.4 Eradication as an impediment to Afghanistan’s reconstruction
***
It has been demonstrated time and again that prohibition of a substance does not work.
Addiction, whether to legal or illegal substances or vices is a HEALTH issue and should be dealt with accordingly.
The only thing which prohibition encourages is corruption, inflated profits and turf 'wars'. It did not work for alcohol (besides making a few people VERY wealthy) and will not work for any substance.
Let the Afghan people use all of the resources which are available to them in their land - allow for legal production of opium and allow for production of associated medicines in situ.
Unless the goal is further radicalisation of the population, the current approach to the problems of drug abuse (not use) are inconsistent with logical thinking. One of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Prohibition has never worked and often makes the problems worse.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Listen to these brave men and women speak out about the draconian War on Drugs - they should know as they were in it.
Monday, February 2, 2009
I go a few days and look what happens!
Good grief can't a girl get some downtime? I haven't bothered with the blog for a few days, clear to anyone who happened by, but here I am today with some time and in the right mood to take a gander at my tiny and insignificant blog and what do I see as I check my statcounter?
This (among others):
VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=horray for mr kaplan %22lee kaplan%22
Search Engine Phrase horray for mr kaplan "lee kaplan"
Search Engine Name Google
Search Engine Host www.google.com
Host Name
IP Address 199.159.114.226 [Label IP Address]
Country United States
Region Maryland
City Gaithersburg
ISP Usda Office Of Operations
Returning Visits 0
Visit Length Multiple visits spread over more than one day
What the heck is that? Who are these people and why are they here - of all places? And why due to a search on Mr. Kaplan's name? Apparantly the USDA is the United States Department of Agriculture, so what are they doing going nuts on this blog?
Is Mr. Kaplan being investigated? We can hope. Though oddly, I doubt it.
Oh and Dee - if you are around and visiting - they were very interested in keying your blog and mine together in their search phrases.
So what does this mean? Probably nothing, maybe something. I could just be having a paranoid moment.
This (among others):
VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referrer http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=horray for mr kaplan %22lee kaplan%22
Search Engine Phrase horray for mr kaplan "lee kaplan"
Search Engine Name Google
Search Engine Host www.google.com
Host Name
IP Address 199.159.114.226 [Label IP Address]
Country United States
Region Maryland
City Gaithersburg
ISP Usda Office Of Operations
Returning Visits 0
Visit Length Multiple visits spread over more than one day
What the heck is that? Who are these people and why are they here - of all places? And why due to a search on Mr. Kaplan's name? Apparantly the USDA is the United States Department of Agriculture, so what are they doing going nuts on this blog?
Is Mr. Kaplan being investigated? We can hope. Though oddly, I doubt it.
Oh and Dee - if you are around and visiting - they were very interested in keying your blog and mine together in their search phrases.
So what does this mean? Probably nothing, maybe something. I could just be having a paranoid moment.
Monday, January 26, 2009
I'm starting to like this guy - Richard Williamson on 911
You go Richard!! Keep the faith, keep the truth and keep being brave!!!!
Friday, January 16, 2009
Media Bias and the Israeli Slaughter
I've been hanging about on the CBC forums, which for the most part until yesterday were not too bad. They allowed comments from all sides of the issue and Israel was being taken to task for her atrocious behaviour in the last 20 odd days.
Something happened yesterday, around lunchtime. First I couldn't access the site - it was very slow. After that it seemed only comments which extolled Israel's virtues were allowed. The number of posts supporting the inhumane actions on the part of the Israeli admin went through the roof. None of my submitted posts were printed. Also, the time lag increased - where before it was usually a few minutes before a rash of new posts appeared, it began to become more like 20 minutes, or 30 minutes before a small number of posts - all supporting the bloodshed and indeed some cheering it on - showed up on screen.
So... I'm thinking there was a 'phonecall' from some 'people' telling the CBC to get back in line and tow the status quo. I wonder - who did the threaten? What did they threaten? We know already the CJC and her ilk want to shut down all protests, all debate and only show the lies supporting Israel's murder spree.
Anyway, I'm going to pen a letter to the editor and ask straight out why this was allowed. I'm not holding my breath for an answer.
Something happened yesterday, around lunchtime. First I couldn't access the site - it was very slow. After that it seemed only comments which extolled Israel's virtues were allowed. The number of posts supporting the inhumane actions on the part of the Israeli admin went through the roof. None of my submitted posts were printed. Also, the time lag increased - where before it was usually a few minutes before a rash of new posts appeared, it began to become more like 20 minutes, or 30 minutes before a small number of posts - all supporting the bloodshed and indeed some cheering it on - showed up on screen.
So... I'm thinking there was a 'phonecall' from some 'people' telling the CBC to get back in line and tow the status quo. I wonder - who did the threaten? What did they threaten? We know already the CJC and her ilk want to shut down all protests, all debate and only show the lies supporting Israel's murder spree.
Anyway, I'm going to pen a letter to the editor and ask straight out why this was allowed. I'm not holding my breath for an answer.
Friday, December 12, 2008
It's Official: RCMP gets away with murder!
I must say that I wasn't surprised. I shook my head, in sadness and dismay, yet I had expected this.
Mounties will not be charged in B.C. taser death
It seems they just didn't have enough evidence. I do wonder, what would have constituted evidence?? Perhaps a video? No, we had that (even though it took a bit for the RCMP to release it!). Witnesses perhaps? No, we had those too - all quite shocked.
If the RCMP is at all concerned about it's dismal public image, then this decision by the courts has simply added fuel to the fire. I guess they don't really care what the public thinks of them, why should they? Given the movement towards a police state, both here and in the US (The UK is already there - fullforce!) is it any wonder that the police involved in this clear case of manslaughter get off Scott-free?
I'm too ticked off currently to write much more. It's just another stepping stone towards the loss of democracy and human rights in this rather pathetic land called Canada. This is not the land I was fooled into believing in as a child.
Very sad.
Mounties will not be charged in B.C. taser death
It seems they just didn't have enough evidence. I do wonder, what would have constituted evidence?? Perhaps a video? No, we had that (even though it took a bit for the RCMP to release it!). Witnesses perhaps? No, we had those too - all quite shocked.
If the RCMP is at all concerned about it's dismal public image, then this decision by the courts has simply added fuel to the fire. I guess they don't really care what the public thinks of them, why should they? Given the movement towards a police state, both here and in the US (The UK is already there - fullforce!) is it any wonder that the police involved in this clear case of manslaughter get off Scott-free?
I'm too ticked off currently to write much more. It's just another stepping stone towards the loss of democracy and human rights in this rather pathetic land called Canada. This is not the land I was fooled into believing in as a child.
Very sad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)