Okay, rant time. Subject: Earth Hour.
What a complete and utter propoganda charade. The WWF (not what you would think) and the Global Warming Moonbats want us all to turn off our lights, in a Kumbaya sort of moment to protest - you got it - Global Warming.
Never mind that AGW is likely the biggest fraud perpetrated by the ptbs, never mind that turning your lights off will make NO difference whatsoever to anything, well other than the toe you stub in the dark, and never mind that this is simply brainwashing on a global scale to get you to give up more rights, more freedoms and prostrate yourself before the alter of global government and TAX collectors.
Fuck Earth Hour - LEAVE THE LIGHTS ON!!
(In fact, I plan on turning every bloody bulb I have on!! Since I usually have maybe two lights on at night - one for reading, and one in the basement in my son's room).
God, this crap makes me mad.
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Climate Change Hysteria - Some (not so) Common Sense from Bob
Professor Bob Carter does a great job here using actual scientific method to torpedo the alarmist AGW hypothesis!! Way to go Bob, I would have loved him as a prof, a true skeptic - which is a pre-requisite to being a scientist!!
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
I've had a few discussions lately about this climate change nonsense. We all know about it, AGW or Anthropogenic Global Warming (hysteria), it is thrown our way on a daily basis in every outlet of mainstream media. As with so many issues dealing with science the mainstream does a rather poor job of it, or good depending of course how one views it and if certain groups stand to gain alot! I really noticed this myself when in my undergrad years I noticed so many errors in reporting just on my own fields of study. I wondered if they even had a science major on staff - at the least to check obvious facts - clearly they don't, or they are getting hosed.
As with almost all issues the media presents a slanted and bias view. Rarely speaking with real researchers, but instead with politicians, celebrities or activists, all with their own agendas. That is not science, and consensus is not science either. This is more of the Big Lie, another facet of the illusion. The co-opting of what was a secular non-partisan environmental movement into partisan political divisions has taken our eyes off real pollution and problems we could fix, just as they wanted.
I hope you all enjoy Carter's presentation, he does a very good job at pointing out the major flaws in the AGW Hypothesis, one which thankfully is standing on some very shakey and cold ground right now.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Oh My Sky - Tinkering with the Weather
Okay, I started this post back in April... but let's put it up anyway:
Over the last couple of days I've seen a few articles mentioning that the Great and Wonderful Obama is considering 'geo-engineering' to solve the Goresque problem of 'Climate Change'.
This includes intentionally spraying particulates into the upper atmosphere to reduce the amount of solar radiation penetrating to the Earth's surface, creating 'fake trees' to sequester CO2
Obama administration considers climate engineering
Obama adviser says radical tinkering needed to combat climate change
I'm thinking they are already doing this:





The above photos are just a few examples of what I see out my own window. The other night I happened to be outside at about 1:00 AM, highly unusual for me as I am not a night owl at all. We looked up at the shining moon - it was a sickly orange and lit up many of these trails webbing across it in the sky. Sadly, the pics I took didn't work out - am in no way a photographer. Needless to say it was very odd.
This is going on alot around here, usually in the mornings and the evenings. It's the same as so many others note - the day is clear and bright and by lunchtime everything is a haze. Also, the flightpaths are overwhelmingly east to west - flying nowhere near our airport. Now and again they will do the grid thing, as can be seen above.
So, are these ideas for weather modification bantered around above just a cover for something they have already been doing?
Who knows - but these 'contrails' aren't what they seem. I grew up on air bases, we used to watch the contrails often - they always disappeared. They did not block out the sun and spread all over the sky.
I don't know what these are, but normal they ain't.
I realise this is a military projection project, but you can check it out anyway:
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
Over the last couple of days I've seen a few articles mentioning that the Great and Wonderful Obama is considering 'geo-engineering' to solve the Goresque problem of 'Climate Change'.
This includes intentionally spraying particulates into the upper atmosphere to reduce the amount of solar radiation penetrating to the Earth's surface, creating 'fake trees' to sequester CO2
Obama administration considers climate engineering
Obama adviser says radical tinkering needed to combat climate change
I'm thinking they are already doing this:





The above photos are just a few examples of what I see out my own window. The other night I happened to be outside at about 1:00 AM, highly unusual for me as I am not a night owl at all. We looked up at the shining moon - it was a sickly orange and lit up many of these trails webbing across it in the sky. Sadly, the pics I took didn't work out - am in no way a photographer. Needless to say it was very odd.
This is going on alot around here, usually in the mornings and the evenings. It's the same as so many others note - the day is clear and bright and by lunchtime everything is a haze. Also, the flightpaths are overwhelmingly east to west - flying nowhere near our airport. Now and again they will do the grid thing, as can be seen above.
So, are these ideas for weather modification bantered around above just a cover for something they have already been doing?
Who knows - but these 'contrails' aren't what they seem. I grew up on air bases, we used to watch the contrails often - they always disappeared. They did not block out the sun and spread all over the sky.
I don't know what these are, but normal they ain't.
I realise this is a military projection project, but you can check it out anyway:
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
Friday, November 21, 2008
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Some More Musings on AGW
So, I was sitting there thinking about my garden. I am doing an overhaul next spring to devote more space to production. Having a nice sized city lot, I have also been entertaining the idea of a functional greenhouse (ie - big enough that if I change my mind inside I don't have to step out to do it! haha). These daydreams led me to the next step - if I get my greenhouse, should I utilize a CO2 generator to increase productivity?
Then something went 'click'.
Hmmm... I thought - in this hysterical world of Man-Made Global Warming can I even buy a CO2 generator any longer? Or will they be banned? Afterall their sole purpose is to generate EXTRA CO2 !! Will there be an extra fee? Will I have to buy Carbon Credits to run the thing?
Obviously, my little greenhouse, if she comes to be, will not be large and thus I probably don't really need it. Yet - it sure got me thinking.
So, you guessed it - I googled CO2 generators and greenhouses. WOW! There are lots and lots of them available! The few I scanned made no mention of what kind of environmental effect all this generating of CO2 may have in contributing to the nasty monster of CO2 derived 'Global Warming' and it is important to note that the majority of these devices use propane or natural gas to produce the needed CO2. The goal is a concentration more than three times that of our atmosphere - around 1000 ppm. The this level production can increase by 40%. Nice return.
But how much CO2 is used exclusively by the plants to generate bio matter? Logic dictates that there will always be a slight excess in order to maintain optimum production. Since airflow is crucial in this contained environment there is no denying that some of this excess CO2 will 'escape' and thus add to the 'monster of GW' (not Bush).
Why then, is this never mentioned as one of the contributing factors in Carbon derived global warming? I've never heard it mentioned, outside of the so called 'deniers' stating that higher CO2 levels leads to greater biomass production - in other words - plants LOVE it! Which of course begs the question - if CO2 is the culprit it is claimed to be, and 'every little bit helps', why are these devices still being sold? You'd think they would be on the 'chopping block' of these Carbon Credit (tax scheme/money grab) supporters.
As I stated, these were just my musings. Yet, the hypocrisy is just to blatant to ignore.
Then something went 'click'.
Hmmm... I thought - in this hysterical world of Man-Made Global Warming can I even buy a CO2 generator any longer? Or will they be banned? Afterall their sole purpose is to generate EXTRA CO2 !! Will there be an extra fee? Will I have to buy Carbon Credits to run the thing?
Obviously, my little greenhouse, if she comes to be, will not be large and thus I probably don't really need it. Yet - it sure got me thinking.
So, you guessed it - I googled CO2 generators and greenhouses. WOW! There are lots and lots of them available! The few I scanned made no mention of what kind of environmental effect all this generating of CO2 may have in contributing to the nasty monster of CO2 derived 'Global Warming' and it is important to note that the majority of these devices use propane or natural gas to produce the needed CO2. The goal is a concentration more than three times that of our atmosphere - around 1000 ppm. The this level production can increase by 40%. Nice return.
But how much CO2 is used exclusively by the plants to generate bio matter? Logic dictates that there will always be a slight excess in order to maintain optimum production. Since airflow is crucial in this contained environment there is no denying that some of this excess CO2 will 'escape' and thus add to the 'monster of GW' (not Bush).
Why then, is this never mentioned as one of the contributing factors in Carbon derived global warming? I've never heard it mentioned, outside of the so called 'deniers' stating that higher CO2 levels leads to greater biomass production - in other words - plants LOVE it! Which of course begs the question - if CO2 is the culprit it is claimed to be, and 'every little bit helps', why are these devices still being sold? You'd think they would be on the 'chopping block' of these Carbon Credit (tax scheme/money grab) supporters.
As I stated, these were just my musings. Yet, the hypocrisy is just to blatant to ignore.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Thanks for the slip up
Global Warming, Shlomal Warming... oy vey!! Will all the lies never cease???
What we have here folks is a power grab and tax utopia, none of which is based on any kind of scientific theory - only hypotheses and unproven as well. One of the biggest give aways that it is just a farce is that so many governments actually buy into this, the mainstream media screaming about rising oceans and the death of us all. What nonsense.
Seems they slipped up though here:
The world has never seen such freezing heat
In the above article, it has been admitted that data supporting the warmest October was actually false! Say it ain't so! Really? How? Well, my friends it seems they used the data from September to calculate the October numbers. Nice one boys - egg on your face feeling kinda slimy??
Anyway, I like it when they screw up, and then twist in the wind trying to phloff it off. Sorta like the temperature instruments being located in parking lots and next to air-conditioning vents... lol.
Enjoy the read, and yes I will be back.
What we have here folks is a power grab and tax utopia, none of which is based on any kind of scientific theory - only hypotheses and unproven as well. One of the biggest give aways that it is just a farce is that so many governments actually buy into this, the mainstream media screaming about rising oceans and the death of us all. What nonsense.
Seems they slipped up though here:
The world has never seen such freezing heat
In the above article, it has been admitted that data supporting the warmest October was actually false! Say it ain't so! Really? How? Well, my friends it seems they used the data from September to calculate the October numbers. Nice one boys - egg on your face feeling kinda slimy??
Anyway, I like it when they screw up, and then twist in the wind trying to phloff it off. Sorta like the temperature instruments being located in parking lots and next to air-conditioning vents... lol.
Enjoy the read, and yes I will be back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)