Thursday, August 27, 2009

Objectionable content???

Oddly, while looking through my stats, someone has now twice flagged me for objectionable content.

Strange that. This blog is certainly not 'objectionable' and if it were I allow comments, so why not tell me?

Silly people. Though I am thinking now perhaps I should save some of my few better pieces, just in case. Gotta say though, me??? Objectionable? Gosh I'm the vanilla milkshake of objectionable!

15 comments:

nobody said...

Hmm... I wonder if I've been flagged. How do I find that?

Off to go have a look...

nobody said...

I couldn't figure it out Buff. Where did you find that information?

Magdelena said...

When I followed the reference link it took me to a page stating that my blog was flagged.

Odd eh?

nobody said...

Yeah Buff, but what reference link? The 'flag blog' link on the front page of the blog?

Magdelena said...

It was the page which the viewer came from, the referrer site. When I clicked to see where they came from it landed me on a page which said: You have flagged this blog for objectionable content. There were a couple of them in my stats all with the same referrer.

Doug Plumb said...

If your blog gets flagged often enough, won't they take it down ?

nobody said...

Oh okay, thanks Buff. But I'm thinking if you did'nt have statcounter (or whatever) you'd never have known. Would I be right in thinking that you can be flagged in blogger and never know until you're shut down? That sounds like bullshit to me.

nobody said...

Oh okay, thanks Buff. But I'm thinking if you did'nt have statcounter (or whatever) you'd never have known. Would I be right in thinking that you can be flagged in blogger and never know until you're shut down? That sounds like bullshit to me.

Magdelena said...

Honestly I don't know if they tell you that you've been flagged. My guess is that they probably don't.

Yeah it's bullshit.. but what isn't these days?

:|

Doug Plumb said...

Maggie,

Good News. I know you will want to write about this.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/09/03/ezra-levant-it-s-a-great-day-for-freedom-of-speech.aspx

"Yesterday, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal did something its never done in its 32-year history. It acquitted somebody of "hate speech" charges. Until now, the tribunal had a 100% conviction rate.

In a 107-page ruling, tribunal member Athanasios Hadjis didn't just throw out the case against Marc Lemire, he threw out the law, too, calling it an infringement of the free speech guarantees of the Charter of Rights."

Penny said...

HEY Maggie!
wtf flagged!?
could you at all figure out who went whining and crying and over what post?


that is incredible, just incredible to me????

like seriously, I agree you are totally unobjectional.

God, can I object to the crap in the msm? Can I flag Israel for their propaganda, how about the US and Canada, I flag them all for unrelenting bullshit!

nobody said...

Grrr! We do like Pen angry, ha ha.

Magdelena said...

Hey guys!

The whiner came from Redmond, Washington, or used a proxy originating there.

The article was "The Shit hits the Walls"

The only thing objectionable about it was the behaviour of the IDF itself - smearing feces all over the place. What is it with this perverse fascination with poop?? Yuck, yuck and yuck again.

Whatever, I'm still here so clearly I am not that objectionable.

;)

Anurag Kumar Lucknow said...

So ultimately what happened. Even my blog now says it has been flagged. What should I do abt it.

Anurag Kumar Lucknow said...

So ultimately what happened. Even my blog now says it has been flagged. What should I do abt it.